Sector study · scan of 13 October 2026
147 of 257 UK hospital websites do not enforce a policy against email being forged in their name
An external, non-intrusive assessment of 269 tracked NHS and independent hospital websites, 13 October 2026
147 of 257
websites with no enforced email-forgery policy (57%)
110
enforce one: 90 refuse, 20 send to spam
22
with a database port answering from the open internet
1 of 257
publishes signed answers about where its domain lives
A message that appears to come from a hospital, about an appointment, a result or a payment, is likely to be acted on. 123 websites publish no record we could find and 24 only ask receiving systems to monitor. The policy covers the exact domain only, not lookalike domains. Do it carefully: list every legitimate sender first, then watch, then send to spam, then refuse.
The estate’s problem is that the middle sits low, not a tail of bad websites. The average full score is 65.1; 193 of 257 websites sit in the needs-improvement band and 31 reach the top.
The two lists differ in opposite directions. The private list enforces a policy more often (23 of 37, against 87 of 220 on the public list) but 33 of 37 rest on a single company for their domain records. The public list is spread across many suppliers but weaker on the control that stops impersonation.
Only 1 of 257 websites publishes signed answers about where its domain lives, and none of the 220 on the public list do. Most public-list websites sit under a shared NHS domain, where this protection depends on the parent domain being signed first, so this is largely a matter for the registry rather than for each organisation.
What this report does not claim
- It names no organisation.
- It does not say anyone was broken into.
- It counts websites, not hospitals.
- It assesses no clinical or patient systems.
- Nothing was logged into or tested.
Read the full report
Download the full report (PDF, 24 pages)Produced by MyDomainRisk, developed by Huro Data Technologies Ltd, which has a commercial interest in this analysis.