News item

Should MyDomainRisk host a cyber posture discussion space?

We are considering a simple place for users to discuss practical cyber posture questions, compare fixes and share lessons from real-world reporting work.

MyDomainRisk already turns external domain checks into plain-English findings. A community space could help with the next step: what users do after a report flags something that needs attention.

The goal would not be incident response, legal advice or a place to share sensitive data. The useful version is practical and moderated: questions about common findings, supplier conversations, evidence packs, MSP reporting, email forensics workflows and how teams explain cyber posture work to non-specialists.

Possible formats

A moderated forum

Best for longer discussions, practical fix threads and searchable answers that can help more than one user.

Monthly office-hours thread

Best for focused questions around recent product changes, reports, email forensics and common remediation work.

Private user group

Best if users want to discuss sensitive operational questions without making everything public.

What would make it useful?

  • Short, practical threads tied to common findings and fixes.
  • Plain-English explanations that help non-specialists take action.
  • Clear moderation rules: no sensitive data, no exploit guidance, no sales noise.
  • A way for Pro and MSP users to compare reporting workflows without exposing client details.

Tell us what would work

If you would use this, tell us which format would help most and what topics you would want covered first.

Share feedback